Tuesday, March 21, 2006

My Moral Lecturer

2 comments
It seems to me that my moral lecturer is a very misinformed lady. I really can't imagine where she picks up these odd pieces of information and please note, completely incorrect, pieces of information. For example, she seems to think that the Buddhists or Hindus *i can't remember which* need to "mencapai karma". The dictionary explanation for karma is a term in several eastern religions that comprises the entire cycle of cause and effect. Karma is a sum of all that an individual has done, is currently doing and will do. And how do you think one would "mencapai karma" then, if karma merely is cause and effect. I think she has confused karma with moksya, which is final liberation or something like that, cos that is something that can be achieved. You can't achieve karma. So when she asked a question going something like what do the hindus believe in, i said they believe in mencapai moksya. And she went, "huh? apa tu? Tak ada macam tu la". No comment.

And also she says that Jesus menerima wahyu when he was 27 yrs old. Wahyu from my understanding is some sort of inspiration from God, i remember this from sejarah when we came across this. It was what God gave to Nabi Muhammad about something or another like that. I would think that Jesus knew what he had to do even since he was a young boy and God has always been inspiring all his actions and everything. Why when he's 27? Now i might be wrong about this fact, i'm not so sure. So if you know more about this, pls let me know. Maybe something happened when Jesus was 27, and if you know, pls leave a comment.

Anyway, these are examples of stuff that she constantly craps. She also says that drinking alcoholic drinks is forbidden in all religions. Aha, if so then we should probably stop taking wine during Communion ennit? Sigh, Why la? Either her resume must be fake or those hiring must be blind. It's terrible. She's not worthy to teach us cos she doesn't even know what she's talking about.

So i thought, what luck la. And i was telling StDavinus about this. And he told me about his lecturer when he was in college. Apparently the Christians believe in The Father, the Mother and the Son. Hahahahaha. I almost died laughing. So i'm not the only one. But i seriously hope that not all Moral lecturers are like that.

Can you imagine, let's say, if some students don't know about these things and they believe what the lecturer is crapping? Can you imagine how rotten their minds would be, filled with this crap? Aiyo...

2 comments :

  1. Jesus was a man - just like us.
    He wasnt born with His identity. He had to discover it! jesus din pop out u go mum i'm hungry.. feed me! And talked with the cows n bulls and the shepherds who came to visit him.
    He had to learn to speak and walk etcetcc.

    He was born without original sin however and therefore without a selfish tendency unlike us.
    But along the way He definitely learnt His identity in God
    At 12 He was already in the temple and "in His Fathers house"
    He had to grow and learn!
    A key to His growing was what He did after leaving the temple. He went back, honoured his parents and was obedient to them.
    Then He grew in wisdom, stature, in favour with God and man.

    We dun know much else. His public ministry began at 30, but it definitely wasnt no wahyu. He probably had been learning and discovering it along the way.
    If she is malay, maybe the Quran says its 27 but definitely not the bible
    ask her wat the quran says about Isa
    In fact it holds Him in very high regard and that Isas followers are to be listened to above all. Ask her if thats true.
    Ask her what she thinks of Surah 19 where isa says he'll be raised to life on the day he dies

    but please do some research first

    ReplyDelete
  2. You know who's worst? My ethics lecturer. We get ethics at intec which is just a fancy-smancy camouflage name for moral. And our lecturers suck because all they teach us are man-defined values. I mean, WHO SETS THESE VALUES? And how can you CATEGORISE values? And wait, if that's not teruk enough, she never stops telling us without fail that sex is BAD. On the other hand, she also keeps acknowledging the fact that sex is a 'nafsu yang perlu dipenuhi'. It's weird. It's like she's uber surpressed or something.


    She made our entire class laugh the other day when she told us in this really serious voice that if a guy and gal sits together, a 'makhluk ketiga' will muncul, iaitu syaitan. My friend, who's name is Tan, kept insisting that was his cousin. Syai Tan. She didn't laugh. But it was just stupid la. After that class, everyone makes sure that there are always GUYS and GIRLS sitting together. To see if she can tahan all the makhluk ketigas.


    Ha.

    ReplyDelete